The
Common Law Group

Rule Of Law

Pieces, Reality, & The Jig-Saw

(Revealing the Big Picture and Reality using E.F.O.C.)

The Common Law Group

 

See left menu for 'common law' training pages

 

---------------|---------------

Introduction to sorting fact from fiction using E.F.O.C.

---------------|---------------

Section 1
How to do a Jig-saw
(starting with a large pile of jigsaw pieces from many different jigsaws)

 

IN THE BEGINNING WE HAVE A HIDDEN PICTURE DEPICTED IN A JIG-SAW THE PIECES OF WHICH ARE UNIDENTIFIED, UNVERIFIED, AND WHICH PIECES ARE MIXED IN WITH AN INFINITE NUMBER OF OTHER PIECES OF AN INFINITE MUMBER OF OTHER JIG-SAWS.

THE IMPORTANCE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE HIDDEN PICTURE IS THAT IT IS MADE UP OF PIECES CONTAINING TRUTH, AND THE ASSEMBLED JIG-SAW DUE TO THE TRUTHS IN ITS PIECES IS CAPABLE OF SHOWING US THE REAL WORLD UNSEEN FOR CENTURIES.

JUST TO MAKE THINGS WORSE, WE THINK THAT WE KNOW AND CAN RECOGNISE THE TRUTH ON THE JIG-SAW PIECES OF TRUTH AS AND WHEN WE SET OUR EYES ON THEM FOR ONE SIMPLE REASON: IN THE PAST WE THOUGHT THAT WE WERE ALREADY SEEING THE REAL WORLD IN A "TRUE BIG PICTURE".

THE PROCESS THAT WE MUST FOLLOW IN ORDER TO REVEAL THE TRUE BIG PICTURE IS COMPLEX AND DEMANDING, AND REQUIRES UNDERSTANFING OF THE ONGOING DECEIT AND TRICKERY PERPETRATED BY POLITICIANS AND A CABAL INTENT ON HIDING THE TRUTH FROM US.

THE PRINCIPLE THAT MUST UNDERLIE EVERY EVALUATION AND ASSESSMENT IS THE E.V.O.C. PRINCIPLE.

first: EVIDENCE, second: FACTS, third: OBSERVATIONS, fourth: CONCLUSIONS,

THE PROCESS IS AS FOLLOWS:

a) As with any jig-saw the pieces must first be sorted into two categories based upon a binary choice. In a normal jig-saw the first sorting is simple, and consists of sorting out the edge pieces consisting of corner pieces and edge pieces, and all the remaining pieces then by definition are from the mid part of the jig-saw, or the middle.

b) The only binary choice open to us when embarking on our task consists of a fundamental definition that has to be understood and enacted for each piece. There are a number of other initial actions, each one not of simple application but at least simple in approach. The reason for this is a random element in each. It may help to understand a fundamental difference between a truth and an untruth: the physical world is the same for all observers due to the fact that a law of physics is true for all observers. Do not worry if this sounds too deep or profound, for it is not that important. What is important is the fact that for each fact there is only one truth, but an infinite number of untruths.

c) Armed with the knowledge of one truth to an infinite number of untruths it is possible to begin to create classifications of 'degrees of likelihood of truth'. This is almost but not quite completely subjective in nature: it possessed an element of pragmatism that separates it from the subjective. It is this pragmatism that provides a potential separation of truths (facts) from a pile of untruths (lies). On 22 November 1963 Mrs Jackie Kennedy inadvertently told the world that the bullet that killed President Kennedy, who was sat at her side, came not from behind, but from in front: not that the world recognised her actions as an indication of something about the final bullet that killed John. The chain of logic that depended upon kinetics that everyone should instinctively understand was an essential component for recognising from her actions the direction of flight of the bullet. Her actions were captured in many photographs and on film and other media around the world such that what she actually did in the 2 seconds after that shot hit the President already rests in the minds of anyone who cared to watch the news on that and the following days.

 

Section 2
'E' for "Evidence"
(make sure the evidence you hold is genuine evidence)

1) One of the most reliable and irrefutable forms of evidence is 'empirical' evidence. Empirical is that which is physical, or verifiable by repeatable experiment, or resulting from direct experience. In principle empirical evidence is irrefutable and generally requires no further verification or support other than in some cases safeguards against falsification by any means. This is usually achieved by maintenance of a 'chain of evidence' and or 'chain of custody'.

2) The most daunting kind of evidence that is empirical in nature but possibly corruptible is that evidence requiring expert interpretation at its point of use or reference. An expert witness can be corrupted, and therefore reputable expert witnesses are going to be the witnesses carrying the most authority in a court or when used to verify the truth. A supporting expert witness may be considered when the evidence itself is complex and potentially more easily misrepresented.

3) Empirical evidence that is potentially capable of misrepresentation is photographic and video, and even celluloid film (e.g. the Zapruder film). Provenance of such film must if possible be corroborated by corroboration that is repeatable and the imagery inspected by critical expert eye for obvious problems or fakery. It is extremely difficult to fake photographic 'evidence' without incorporating tell-tale signs of fakery (the BBC is quite good at this).

4) Expert witness alone may constitute evidence. The degree of reliability of this evidence may be subject to comments already made on witness evidence above. Expert witness evidence will usually come in the form of a professional report.

5) Bystander and layman witness evidence does not hold the authority or weight of expert witness evidence, but nevertheless can provide essential information that may be key in the establishment of truth and reality. Again such evidence is subject to potential problems described above.

6) Affidavits are in law regarded as 'law'. There may be used as qualified evidence because 'both sides' of a dispute or legal or lawful issue have by set standards agreed or consented or arrived at consensus on the question.

7) Statements such as those collected by police or authorities in support of a case or a defence are also a form of evidence as can be submitted to a court, but as with all statements and contracts, the agreement is invalid if not given by free will.

Section 3
'F' for "Facts"
(established as true)

8) The establishing of facts can only take place in the presence of evidence. Once evidence is established, a fact or facts should be discernible from each item of evidence. The evidence regarded as of proven efficacy can be used to assert or establish certain fact or facts: e.g. a bullet was cause of death, and; the bullet came from an x mm calibre gun.

9) In communications it is generally recommendable to provide reference to the source of evidence or its provenance for future reference. This is, as stated in Section 2, 1) 'chain of evidence' and 'chain of custody'.

10) Pieces of verified evidence each may be regarded as a piece of the jig-saw, but each must be used with care. Testing and retesting of efficacy and truth in relation to each fact must be carried out until multiple verifications by both empirical and circumstantial evidence is achieved.

11) Never must 'belief' be misinterpreted as 'fact'. Part of the current global psychological attack on men and women has been perpetrated by the deliberate conflation of the two by many media sources in the mainstream media including first and foremost the BBC.

Section 4
'O' for "Observations"
(based on true facts)

12) Observations made of an item of evidence form the first step in creation of an idea based upon the fact. When taken collectively multiple facts each with an observation or idea formed around it may congeal into a larger fact, or idea.

13) The act of connecting separate facts is often referred to as "joining the dots". Such joining of dots frequently creates mutual support between separate facts in addition to the evidence individually supporting the facts. A matrix of supporting 'joined dots' may appear very quickly once 3 or more facts form a unit or area of proven knowledge. Intelligence thus comes into existence and is built.

Section 5
'C' for "Conclusions"
(based on accurate observations based on truth)

14) With the foregoing sections 1 to 3 in place representing 'E', 'F', and 'O' we now may embark on 'C', Conclusions. Observations made of an item of evidence form the first step in creation of an idea based upon the fact. When taken collectively multiple facts each with an observation or idea formed around it may congeal into a larger fact, or idea.

 

Section 6
Sort fact from fiction
(in sections 1 through 4 we have established pieces of truth)
(these are then pieces of the jigsaw of truth)

 

 

Section 7
Discard fiction and sort the facts
(excise fiction from mind, and prepare to join dots)

 

 

 

Section 8
Now join the dots
(assemble the pieces of the jigsaw)

 

 

Section 9
Allow the picture of truth to be revealed
(constantly re-appraise Observations and adjust Conclusions)

 

WARNING:

Much of the following items of evidence are embedded YouTube videos.
Due to the constant endeavours by YouTube to censor and suppress truth and to thereby hide reality, videos are frequently taken off by YouTube under the pretext that the videos contravene YouTube (arbitrary and secret) social rules etc etc.

As and when this occurs the same video may be re-uploaded by the originator of the video or may reappear on an alternative video streaming web site and when this is found to be the case then the video is reinstated in the evidence item that first initiated the creation/inclusion of the item.

When a video has been found to have been taken down, the item will be marked with a red star thus *
When an alternative location has been found and the original video reinstated the item will be acquire a 2 stars thus **

____________!____________

(Datestamp 22/02/2021) This origins of this page gathered over a period of months following the outbreak of the Fake Pandemic being passed off as Covid, corona, sars, and a collection of lies compiled by a criminal global .cabal including the Rockefellers, the Rothschilds, and approximately 12 other families possibly collectively the Iluminati.

____________!____________

 

The following video would seem frivolous if it were not for the wonderful and lively music providing a spiritual pickup for many.

However, the video itself should be watched and thought about afterwards, for it provides a clear example of what may happen if you discount over-belief in coincidence (as a sort of religion and classify it as such) and think about how the picture that a small collection of observations may convey when "the dots are joined" (i.e. the pieces are fitted together).

This is the principle of the Jig-Saw in this context, and the essential nature of "evidence" before "fact", lest one is fed a "false fact".

Video 1
9:58

Coincidence?

To return to top of page please click here

To go to a page deeper in the rabbit hole please click here